Board index » alternative » anth and the flush - loa loa?

2004-03-07 02:25:47 PM
"Ilsa9.10" <ilsa9w@aol.comMHACampX>wrote in message
Had she been to Africa? That is not a parasite found in the USA as far as I
know. Could the Lab have made a mistake in identifying the parasite she
submitted for identification? Also, unless I missed something these are not
passed in the stool since they don't infest the GI track. A purge of the GI
tract would not remove them. See:
www.biosci.ohio-state.edu/~parasite/lifecycles/loa_lifecycle.html
Kim
-

You should reaslize by now you can't believe Andrew Kingoff who is NOT IIsa. I
don't recall ever saying I saw any *large* parasites. He can prove it by
showing where I said it, or be labled a liar AGAIN.
Furthermore this has been discussed over and over and over and twisted and
twisted and twisted, nad I refused to discuss it again. You are being used as a
sucker and baited by Andrew and Rich.
Jan
-

On 07 Mar 2004 09:58:58 GMT, jdrew63929@aol.com (Jan) wrote:
issue of whether she claimed a lab test revealed that she was infested
with loa loa parasite which is ONLY found in Africa, Jan focuses on a
diversion. She wants to change the focus to whether she specifically
used the word large. If a parasite is visible to the naked eye it may
be considered large. Many parasites invisible to the naked eye are
small.
won't discuss it. Jan won't discuss it because she realizes that it is
essentially impossible for her to have been infected with loa loa
unless she visited Africa. Has there been a single case of confirmed
loa loa in US where someone did not visit Africa??
tactics.
Aloha,
Rich
-------------------------------------------------
The best defense to logic is ignorance
-

health alternative